(from Jersey Coast Anglers Association
October 2006 Newsletter)
Contents:
Below I
will be discussing summer flounder and Tom Siciliano will discuss weakfish.
Both of these species are having problems meeting the goals set under their
individual fisheries management plans. Even though the problems are slightly
different the actions by NMFS and ASMFC are always the same. In summer flounder
we have a fishery that has grown dramatically in 10 years but has poor
recruitment and is not reaching the imaginary goal set for 2010. We are quite
sure environmental issues and natural mortality are significant contributing
factors. But since these issues are not addressed by NMFS, they act as though
these issues don’t exist. The weakfish
fishery
presents another problem. Weakfish actually had good recruitment for many years
but were not producing mature fish. Again, scientists agree fishermen are not
the cause of the problem, but since we are the only factors that are under their
control we will pay the entire price and other possible factors will be
ignored. It doesn’t seem to make any difference what issues are presented by
wetlands protection, water quality, and loss of habitat, ASFMC and NMFS cannot
impact on these elements, and can only advise.
In general, their suggestions are ignored and fishermen pay the price.
Please
read the article included about the environmental impact on the sex ratio of
fish. The more we study the more it becomes apparent that there are many more
environmental factors to consider than there were 30 years ago. Think about the
release of drugs and more sophisticated chemicals into the bays and estuaries
and then ask yourself about the importance of considering these factors when
looking at the problems of specific species.
That is
why JCAA has always been an environmental organization and has sought alliances
and partnerships with other environmental organizations. We realize that we
might disagree about specific fisheries management issues but we are in
agreement that the environment needs to be our first priority. Without a
healthy environment we won’t have any fish to manage.
SUMMER FLOUNDER
CRAZINESS CONTINUES
Since
the last newspaper many interesting things have happened. I was hoping I would
have better news but, as usual in fisheries management, I have only bad news to
report. We will begin with summer flounder. We were hoping for a quick fix
with the reauthorization of the Magnusson Act. At this time the Magnusson Act
is not moving. Because of the controversy and the push by factions on both
sides of the issues, the House of Representatives decided not to move on the
bill until at least after the elections. There is no assurance that there will
be any action on the bill after the election or that the bill will address the
problems with summer flounder. All we can do is keep putting pressure on
Congress to ask them to address this serious issue.
In the meantime, JCAA will be
focusing our attention on the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission.
ASMFC will be taking up this issue and voting on a quota the week of October 23rd.
The Flounder, Scup and Black Sea Bass Management Board Meeting is scheduled for
Wednesday, October 25, 2006 7:30 AM - 10:30 AM. We are asking ASMFC to hold
firm at the 19.9 million pounds already approved by the Mid-Atlantic Marine
Fisheries Management Council. Previously many of us have directed our attention
solely to the commissioners and those efforts have not proven successful. We
need another approach. As you can see from the letter and press release below,
we are focusing our attention on the governors of the states represented on the
Summer Flounder Management Board. If you live in a state from Massachusetts to
North Carolina, whether you are a recreational or commercial fisherman, you need
to contact your governor by writing a letter similar to the one included in this
newspaper. If you have any friends, relatives or fellow anglers in these
states, ask them to do the same. There is much more information about summer
flounder in the September newspaper. If you don’t have a copy you can find it
on the JCAA webpage (
http://www.jcaa.org ).
Another
option JCAA is looking at is trying to get the environmental groups to come
forward and express their opposition to NMFS needless draconian plans. It is
interesting that I hear environmental groups complaining that the commercial and
recreational fishing communities are trying to relax standards in the Magnusson
Act. The problem is when NMFS suggests such ridiculous management measures and
the environmental community sits quietly by and says nothing, pushing for the
relaxed standards is the only option left for us. If the environmental
community used some common sense and supported reasonable, common sense
management efforts, we wouldn’t have to support more extreme measures. In this
situation
the environmental community has stood idly by and,
a
by default, let bad science support draconian decisions.
The
environmental community suggests we are partners and we should be working
together to rebuild the stocks. At this time this partnership is very
one-sided. If this continues this lack of leadership and support for a common
sense plan for summer flounder could destroy the partnership. Remember, this is
not a fishery that is overfished. This is a fishery that has doubled the stock
and tripled the
spawning stock biomass. The letter and press release are included at the end of
this report.
DRAFT ADDENDUM
II TO AMENDMENT 4 TO THE INTERSTATE FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR WEAKFISH
Prepared for Public Comment August 2006
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
PUBLIC COMMENT PROCESS AND PROPOSED
TIMELINE
The public is
encouraged to submit comments regarding Draft Addendum II and it’s Supplement at
any time during the addendum process. Comments will be accepted until 5:00 pm on
October 10, 2006. Regardless of when they were sent, comments received after
that time will not be included in the official record.
Comments may be
submitted by mail, email, or fax. If you would like to submit comment in
writing, please use the contact information below. Mail: Nichola Meserve
Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission 1444 ‘Eye’ Street, Northwest
Washington, D.C. 20005 Email:
comments@asmfc.org (subject line: weakfish) Fax: (202) 289-6051 If you
have any questions or would like more information, please call Nichola Meserve
at (202) 289-6400.
1). The Weakfish Stock Assessment Subcommittee (SAS) conducted
an assessment in 2004-2005 that concluded that biomass fell suddenly after 1999
and approached the lowest level of the time-series by 2003 (Figure 2). Total
mortality began a steady increase in the mid-1990s; fishing mortality was low
throughout the 1990s and only increased slightly after 2000 (Figure 3.) The SAS
does not attribute the large decline in biomass to this slight rise in fishing
mortality. Natural mortality has risen and has become a much greater portion of
total mortality than fishing mortality (Figure 3). The SAS has not determined
the exact source of the rise in natural mortality, but has investigated
hypotheses about species interactions. Both insufficient forage (Atlantic
menhaden, spot, and bay anchovy), and increased predation and competition (from
striped bass, Atlantic croaker, and summer flounder) in the Mid-and North
Atlantic have been supported in analyses as explanations for the rise in natural
mortality. Figure 1. Coastwide landings of weakfish (NMFS 2005)
JERSEY COAST ANGLERS ASSOCIATION
Working For the Saltwater Resource & Marine Anglers
September 5, 2006
Letter to Governor Jon Corzine on
Summer Flounder Quota
JCAA sincerely
feels that we cannot rely on the National Marine Fisheries Service to
make a correct decision about the summer flounder quota for 2007. Their record
in fisheries management has been dismal. They continually fail to recognize the
economic and social consequences of their actions. There is considerable
attention being focused on the Magnuson Act and its renewal but
JCAA is unsure that the Magnuson Act will even pass this year. Even
if it does pass it may not have any positive impact on the current problem for
summer flounder in 2007.
After careful
consideration, JCAA is recommending that we focus our energies on ASMFC. At
this time ASMFC has not voted on a quota for summer flounder for 2007. We
believe it is time for ASMFC to stand up to NMFS rather than simply rubber stamp
NMFS’s draconian recommendations. As a former commissioner I have asked ASMFC
to take a stand contrary to NMFS several times. Recently I have no success in
getting ASMFC commissioners from other states to use common sense and represent
the best interests of their states, the recreational and commercial communities
and the resource. Our previous efforts have all focused on the individual
commissioners. However, two of the three commissioners from each of the 14
states in the compact are appointed by and report directly to their governor.
They are the Governor’s Appointee and the State Director. The other
commissioner is the Legislative Representative.
With this in mind,
JCAA is asking Governor Corzine to take a leadership role by directing his
commissioners to vote for the 19.9 million pound quota recommended by the staff
of the Monitoring Committee and passed by the Mid-Atlantic Marine Fisheries
Management Council. Although JCAA does not believe this 3.7 million pound
reduction is necessary we understand this quota would meet the 50% probability
to prevent overfishing required by the summer flounder fisheries management
plan. In addition, we are asking Governor Corzine to contact the governors
whose states are represented on the Summer Flounder Management Board. These are
the states from Massachusetts to North Carolina. JCAA would like these
governors to direct their commissioners to vote with New Jersey and support the
19.9 million pound quota. We are in contact with groups representing
recreational and commercial interests in these states and we are asking them to
contact their governors and make their support for this action known.
Many
individuals have been asking what they should do and who they should write to.
Here’s your chance. Write to your governor supporting this action and send
a copy of the letter to all 3 of your commissioners. You can find the
addresses of your commissioners at the ASMFC website
http://www.asmfc.org .
JCAA is sending a letter to
Governor Corzine making this a formal request. I have enclosed a copy of that
letter. Given Governor Corzine’s understanding of this problem and the support
for this action he will receive from the Division of Fish and Wildlife, we
anticipate his prompt positive response to our request. It will be helpful to
him, however, to hear directly from as many individual anglers and fishing
organizations as possible. New Jersey’s commissioners have a history of
supporting common sense fisheries management, especially for summer flounder.
This is not true of the commissioners from all the other states represented on
the Summer Flounder Management Board. We can’t stop with our governor, whose
support we anticipate, but must reach out to friends, organizations and fellow
anglers in other states and ask them to turn up the heat at home.
Thomas Fote
Legislative Chairman
JERSEY COAST ANGLERS ASSOCIATION
Working For the Saltwater Resource & Marine Anglers
Letter to Jon Corzine:
Wednesday, September 20, 2006
The Honorable Jon Corzine
Governor State of New Jersey
PO Box 001
The State House, CN-001
Trenton NJ 08625-0001
Dear Governor Jon Corzine:
As you know from our prior conversations, there is
a serious crisis brewing for New Jersey and our Mid-Atlantic neighbors with
summer flounder. The National Marine Fisheries Service has proposed a quota
that would have a huge negative economic and quality of life impact on New
Jersey residents. The 5.2 million pound quota proposed by NMFS for 2007 would
virtually shut down the fishery costing the commercial and recreational fishing
industry hundreds of millions of dollars and millions in NJ tax revenues. This
would also have a negative impact on the hundreds of thousands of recreational
anglers who fish for summer flounder in the spring, summer and fall. The ripple
effect of this loss would have a dramatic negative impact on the entire tourism
industry. This would not only affect New Jersey but every coastal state from
Massachusetts to North Carolina. Our biggest concern is that this action by
NMFS would have virtually no impact on the long-term health of the summer
flounder stock or help the rebuilding goals set by NMFS. Included with this
letter are materials produced and collected by JCAA. The New Jersey Division of
Fish and Wildlife, including their scientists, agree with JCAA’s position.
The Mid-Atlantic Marine
Fisheries Management Council has voted for a quota of 19.9 million pounds. This
represents a decrease of 3.8 million pounds from the current quota for 2006 of
23.6 million pounds. JCAA did not support this reduction but we understand that
this meets the 50% probability required by the current fisheries management
plan. We are in contact with both commercial and recreational groups along the
coast and in New Jersey and there is unanimous support for the 19.9 million
pound quota. At this time NMFS is reviewing the targets and the quota. It is
impossible to predict what they will recommend. The Atlantic States Marine
Fisheries Commission has not voted on a quota. ASMFC is the compact of the 14
coastal states and has a better track record for rebuilding stocks than NMFS.
ASMFC should take a leadership role rather than rubber stamp the recommendations
from NMFS. New Jersey has three commissioners to ASMFC as do all the other
states who are members. JCAA is asking you to direct the Governor’s Appointee
and the representative from the New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife to
support the quota of 19.9 million pounds at the ASMFC meeting in October. This
19.9 million pound quota will meet the guidelines for the current management
plan. This quota will continue to rebuild the stocks without completely
devastating New Jersey’s fishing industry. In addition, JCAA is also asking for
you to take the lead in contacting governors from other states represented at
ASMFC and asking them to direct their representatives to take the same action.
New Jersey has always been at the forefront for conservation and reasonable
fisheries management. It is time for New Jersey to take a leadership role in
resolving this matter. Your leadership is vital.
JCAA would never ask
you to take action that would harm the long-term viability of any marine
species. But as you know from our discussions and the materials enclosed, the
proposed action by NMFS is not in the spirit of conservation or appropriate
fisheries management. The timing of this action is crucial. That is why we are
asking you for your immediate action. NMFS has indicated that their review will
be complete by October 23. We cannot wait for that date since we have no way of
knowing what they will recommend and the economic consequences are too severe.
Thank you for your support. Please contact me if you need additional
information.
JCAA
representatives would like to meet with you and Commissioner Lisa Jackson to
discuss this crucial issue.
Sincerely,
Thomas Fote
Legislative Chairman
I will be attending the annual Atlantic States Marine
Fisheries Commission meeting in North Carolina the week of October 22nd.
I know Atlantic Beach, North Carolina is not easily accessible but hopefully
some of you will attend. Weakfish and summer flounder are scheduled for Wednesday.
If you cannot attend make sure your commissioners know how you
feel about summer flounder and weakfish before they leave for the meeting.
Commissioners are listed on the ASMFC webpage (http://www.asmfc.org
). If you have any questions, please email me
(tfote@jcaa.org ). I am including an agenda for the meeting.
ASMFC 65th Annual Meeting
October 23 - 26, 2006
Sheraton Atlantic Beach Hotel
2717 Fort Macon Road
Atlantic Beach, North Carolina
(800)214-0258
PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE
The preliminary
agenda is subject to change. The agenda reflects the current estimate of time
required for scheduled meetings. The Commission may adjust this agenda in
accordance with the actual duration of meetings. Interested parties should
anticipate meetings starting earlier or later than indicated herein.
If you intend to
bring any meeting materials for use by a board or committee not included in the
Commission's 65th Annual Meeting Briefing Materials CD-ROM, please bring 50
copies to the meeting. Click here for ASMFC public comment guidelines.
Directions
Travel Authorization ASMFC Travel Reimbursement Guidelines
Monday, October 23, 2006
8:30 AM - 11:30 AM American Lobster Management Board
12:30 PM - 1:15 PM Shad & River Herring Management Board
1:30 PM - 2:30 PM Atlantic Striped Bass Management Board
2:00 PM - 6:00 PM Management & Science Committee (MSC)
2:00 PM - 6:00 PM Law Enforcement Committee
2:45 PM - 5:45 PM Meeting of the Special Ad-Hoc Committee of
ASMFC and
North Carolina Marine Fisheries Commission
6:30 PM - 8:30 PM Welcome Reception at Pine Knoll Shores
Aquarium
Tuesday, October 24, 2006
7:30 AM - 9:30 AM South Atlantic State/Federal Fisheries
Management Board
8:00 AM - 12:30 PM MSC/Habitat Committee Workshop
8:30 AM - Noon Law Enforcement Committee (continued)
9:45 AM - 11:45 AM
Action Plan Workshop
Noon - 1:00 PM LGA Luncheon Meeting
1:15 PM - 4:00 PM Spiny Dogfish and Coastal Sharks
Management Board
1:30 PM - 5:00 PM Management and Science Committee
1:30 PM - 5:00 PM Habitat Committee
4:15 PM - 6:00 PM American Eel Management Board
6:30 PM - 8:30 PM Dinner at The Dunes Club
Wednesday, October 25, 2006
7:30 AM - 10:30 AM Summer Flounder, Scup and Black Sea Bass
Management Board
10:45 AM - 12:15 PM Tautog Management Board
12:30 PM - 1:30 PM Captain David H. Hart Award Luncheon
1:45 PM - 4:15 PM Atlantic Menhaden Management Board
4:30 PM - 6:30 PM Weakfish Management Board
7:00 PM - 9:00 PM Oyster Roast at North Carolina Division of
Marine Fisheries
Thursday, October 26, 2006
8:00 AM - 9:00 AM Executive Committee
9:15 AM - 12:15 PM ISFMP Policy Board
12:30 PM - 1:00 PM Business Session
1:00 PM - 1:30 PM Buffet Lunch for Commissioners
1:30 PM - 4:30 PM Atlantic Coastal Cooperative Statistics
Program Coordinating Council
More 'Intersex Fish' Found in Potomac
Sep 6, 6:58 PM (ET)
By MATTHEW BARAKAT
McLEAN, Va. (AP) -
Some species of male fish in the Potomac River and its tributaries are
developing female sexual traits at a frequency higher than scientists have seen
before, raising concerns about pollutants in a waterway that provides drinking
water for millions of people.
The so-called "intersex
fish," which produce immature eggs in their testes, were discovered in the
Potomac rivershed in 2003 and have also been found in other parts of the
country.
But the frequency
that the U.S. Geological Surveys found last year is much higher than what has
been found elsewhere, said fish pathologist Vicki Blazer.
In some Potomac
tributaries, nearly all of the male smallmouth bass caught in last year's survey
were the abnormal fish. In the Potomac itself, seven of 13 largemouth bass
exhibited female characteristics, including three that were producing eggs.
Although the
frequency discovered was surprisingly high, Blazer cautioned that the sample
size was relatively small, with about 10 male and 10 female fish taken from each
of eight locations in Maryland, Virginia and the District of Columbia.
Researchers were
reluctant to remove large numbers of bass from the rivers because of
conservation concerns, she said.
Female fish caught
in the survey did not develop any unusual sex traits, though fish of both sexes
exhibited lesions and other pollution-related problems, said Blazer, who
coordinated the survey.
Smallmouth bass
appear to be more susceptible to intersex development than largemouth bass,
Blazer said.
Blazer said
researchers are still waiting on data that would help them determine the water
quality at the time the fish were caught, but preliminary data taken from the
Potomac found a variety of chemical pollutants.
It is not exactly
clear what is causing the changes, though it is likely a combination of
pollutants, scientists say. Certain chemicals and pesticides are believed to
stimulate estrogen production. Also, estrogen from birth control pills and human
waste can make its way from sewage treatment plants to the waterways.
The Environmental
Protection Agency has been studying the issue of so-called "endocrine
disruptors" since 1996, but currently does not issue guidelines to water
treatment plants for allowable levels of estrogenic compounds.
Jeanne Bailey, a
spokeswoman for Fairfax Water, said the findings are a concern. The water
authority, which draws from the Potomac and Occoquan rivers to provide service
to roughly 1.5 million people, is working with USGS and other agencies to
research and develop ways to improve water treatment to eliminate potentially
harmful compounds.
The water treatments used by Fairfax Water, including ozone and
activated charcoal, have been shown to reduce levels of estrogenic compounds,
she said. Bailey cautioned against drawing dire conclusions about the impact on
human health. She said, "Fish are a great indicator of the health of our waters,
but they are not a great indicator of what may translate to humans."